Interface USB 3.0 – SuperSpeed USB standard
USB Implementers Forum finalized specifications standard USB 3.0 at the end of 2008. As one might expect, the new increased bandwidth, although the increase is not as great as 40-fold increase in speed when moving from USB 1.1 to USB 2.0. In any case, a 10-fold increase in bandwidth is welcome. USB 3.0 supports a maximum transfer rate of 5 Gbit / sec. The capacity is almost twice the current standard Serial ATA (3Gb / s with a light transmission of information redundancy).
Every enthusiast will confirm that the USB 2.0 interface is a major "bottleneck" of modern computers and laptops, since its peak of "pure" capacity ranges from 30 to 35 MB / sec. But the modern 3.5 "hard drives for desktop speed is over 100 MB / s (and there are 2.5" notebook models, which come near to this level.) High-speed solid-state drives have successfully surpassed the threshold of 200 Mbytes / sec. A 5-Gb / s (or 5120 Mbit / s) corresponds to 640 MB / sec.
We do not think that in the foreseeable future, hard drives come close to the level of 600 MB / s, but the next-generation solid-state drives may exceed this number in several years. Increased bandwidth is becoming more important as the amount of information increases, respectively, and increases the time of her redundancy. The faster the storage, the less the time of booking, the easier it will make a "window" to schedule backups.
Table comparing the characteristics of high-speed USB 1.0 - 3.0
Digital cameras today can record and store gigabytes of video data. HD-camcorders share is increasing, but they require higher capacity and faster storage to record large amounts of data. If you use USB 2.0, then the transfer of tens of gigabytes of video data to a computer for editing takes a long time. USB Implementers Forum believes that the capacity will be fundamentally important, and USB 3.0 will be sufficient for all consumer devices over the next five years.
Encoding 8 / 10 bit
To ensure reliable data transfer USB 3.0 interface uses a coding 8 / 10 bit, familiar to us, such as Serial ATA. One byte (8 bits) is transmitted using 10-bit encryption, which improves the reliability of the transmission at the expense of bandwidth. Therefore, the transition from bits to bytes performed with a ratio of 10:1 instead of 8:1.
Power-saving modes
Of course, the main purpose USB 3.0 interface is to increase the available bandwidth, but the new standard effectively optimize power consumption. The USB 2.0 interface constantly polls the availability of devices for which energy is consumed. In contrast, there are four USB 3.0 connection status, called U0-U3. Connection Status U0 corresponds to an active data transfer, and U3 puts the device in "sleep".
If the connection is idle, then in a position to U1 will be disabled be able to receive and transmit data. Status of U2 goes one step further by turning off the internal clock. Accordingly, the attached devices can be transformed into a state of U1 immediately after the data that is supposed to provide tangible benefits in power consumption when compared to USB 2.0.
More current
In addition to different power states USB 3.0 standard is different from USB 2.0 and higher supported by the current. If USB 2.0 provided the threshold current is 500 mA, in the case of the new standard limitation was shifted to the plate 900 mA. Current at the initiation of connections has been increased from a level of 100 mA in USB 2.0 up to 150 mA from USB 3.0. Both parameters are important for portable hard drives, which typically require slightly larger currents. Previously, the problem could be solved with the help of additional plug USB, receiving power from two ports, but using only one data transfer, even if it violated the specifications of USB 2.0.
New cables, connectors, color-coding
Standard USB 3.0 is backward compatible with USB 2.0, ie forks seem the same as conventional fork type A. Contact USB 2.0 remained in the same place, but in the depths of slots are now five new contacts. This means that you need to fully insert the plug in the USB 3.0 port USB 3.0, to verify operation, USB 3.0, which requires additional contacts. Otherwise you will get the speed of USB 2.0. USB Implementers Forum recommends that manufacturers use color-coded Pantone 300C connector on the inside.
Similar situation has turned for the USB-plug type B, although the differences are more noticeable visually. The plug USB 3.0 can be identified by five additional contacts.
USB 3.0 does not use fiber optics because it is too expensive for the mass market. Therefore, we have a good old copper cable. But now he will be nine instead of four wires. Data is transmitted in four of five extra wires in differential mode (SDP-Shielded Differential Pair). One pair is responsible for receiving information, the other - for the transfer. The principle of operation is similar to the Serial ATA, while devices get the full bandwidth in both directions. The fifth wire - "earth".
Do you like what you have? Types of LCD TV Panel Technology.
Today LCD TV dominant display technology, compare to Plasma, CRT, and etc. For LCD (liquid crystal display), there are many different type of panel technologies used for production of LCD televisions and LCD monitors.The budget panel technology is TN panel, while the expensive panel technology target high-end market and professional quality are S-IPS and S-PVA panels. LCD panel technology not limit by LED LCD TV or CCFL LCD TV, it is independent from the backlighting technology and it do contribute to contract ratio, brightness, switching speed (or respond time), viewing angle and color depth. The average consumer usually has no idea what panel technology is used in their LCD TV, simply because the panel type is rarely listed by the manufacturer in the LCD TV specifications.
Many buyers buy LCD TV based on price and size. Price should be a factor, but you should still know the advantages and disadvantages of the different LCD panel types and be able to identify them before you decide which LCD TV (model and brand) to purchase.
One item of LCD TV that manufacturers don’t usually make a big deal about happens to be the aspect of any display that seems to matter most is the panel technology. There are three general categories of panel technology:
- TN – Twisted Nematic (cheaper to produce and biggest market share)
- IPS – In Plane Switching
- MVA / PVA – Multi-domain Vertical Alignment / Patterned Vertical Alignment
Opinions about which technology is actually best differ somewhat, but there’s no denying the fact that TN is substantially cheaper to produce whereas PVA and IPS are more expensive. Vast majority of LCD TVs (and monitors) today are once again using TN panels, largely because of the pricing advantage.
TN (Twisted Nematic) Panel Technology
TN (Twisted Nematic) panels are the most widely used panel type in the manufacture of LCD panels. TN panels are cheap and offer excellent response times. The response times of current TN panels range from 2ms to 5ms. However, color reproduction, viewing angles and contrast ratios of TN panels are the worst of any current LCD panel technology, particularly vertical viewing angles. Unlike most 8-bit IPS/VA based panels, TN is only 6-bit and unable to display the full 16.7 million colors available in 24-bit true color. Most TN panels are natively 6-bit panels that use dithering to approximate 8-bit color. Most people won’t notice the difference in color accuracy of TN panels. They can mimic the 16.7 million colors of 8-bit panels using a technique called dithering, but the results are unimpressive. TN panels dominate LCD TV market because they are very inexpensive and produce good enough display for most buyers.
IPS (In-Plane-Switching) Panel Technology – S-IPS/H-IPS
IPS (In Plane Switching) panels are generally considered the best overall LCD technology for image quality, color accuracy, good viewing angles, true 8-bit colors, but all this comes at a price. S-IPS (Super-IPS, Hitachi in 1998) panels offer the best viewing angles of any current LCD technology, with wide viewing angles up to 178 degrees. The response time of S-IPS is adequate, ranging from 6ms to 16ms. It responds time is only slightly slower than TN panels. Fast paced motion picture (sport game show) may suffer from motion blur or ghosting with S-IPS panels that have a response time higher than 8ms.
S-IPS panels can be identified by a slight purple hue on blacks when viewed from a wide angle. There are currently few manufacturers using S-IPS panels in comparison to the other panels types making choices limited and they often carry a premium price tag. H-IPS (Horizontal-IPS, NEC in 2007) is a newer variation of S-IPS with a different pixel structure that improves contrast ratios and lowers pixel pitch to provide better picture quality.
The famous LCD TV manufacturers based on IPS technology are LG-Philips, and IPS Alpha Technology (formed by Hitachi, Panasonic and Toshiba).
VA (Vertical Alignment) Panel Technology – MVA / PVA
VA (Vertical Alignment) technology such as S-PVA/MVA is middle of the road LCD panels. They offer better color reproduction and wider viewing angles than TN panels, but have slower response times. They are very similar to S-IPS on paper. They also offer large viewing angles and good color reproduction, though not as good as S-IPS. The response times are generally worse than TN or S-IPS panels.
VA panels have the advantage of higher contrast ratios compared to other panel types, which leads to better black levels. The biggest disadvantage of VA based panels is color shifting. Color shifting is when the image viewed from one angle changes or “shifts” when viewed from a slightly different angle, making various uneven brightness levels across the display. Color shifts also cause a loss of shadow detail in dark scenes when viewed directly from the center. VA panels are much easier to find compared to IPS because so many manufacturers use them. They offer better image quality than TN at lower price than IPS based panels.
MVA (Multi-domain Vertical Alignment) was originally developed in 1998 by Fujitsu as a compromise between TN and IPS. It achieved fast pixel response, wide viewing angles and high contrast at the cost of brightness and color reproduction. Modern MVA panels can offer wide viewing angles (second only to S-IPS technology), good black depth, good color reproduction and depth, and fast response times.
PVA (patterned vertical alignment) and S-PVA (super patterned vertical alignment) offers similar features to MVA, but boasts very high contrast ratios such as 3000:1. S-PVA panels all use at least true 8-bit color electronics and do not use any color simulation methods. S-PVA panels offered by Eizo (at least newer ones) use even 10-bit color internally, which enables gamma and other corrections without banding. PVA and S-PVA can offer good black depth, wide viewing angles and S-PVA can offer additionally fast response times thanks to modern RTC technologies.
Famous LCD TV manufacturers using S-PVA panels for their LCD TV are Samsung and Sony.
Get high quality TV Stand, TV cabinet and living room furniture that ship across North America, variety of choices products to suite your design.
What is better for you? What the difference of LCD and Plasma technology?
There are thousand of arguments for this topic. If you do a search at google, the return result is more then million pages. Below are comparisons of of the two technologies. Wich is better for you? What the difference of LCD and Plasma technology?
What the different of LCD and Plasma technology?
Plasma and LCD panels may look similar, but the flat screen and thin profile is where the similarities end. Plasma screens, uses a matrix of tiny gas plasma cells charged by precise electrical voltages to create picture. While LCD screens, as it name suggests, liquid crystal display are liquid crystal sandwiches between two glass panel. Again, electrical charge voltage applied to varying the liquid crystals. Plasma TV have slightly edge over LCD in term of black color display, which mean better contrast and detail in dark-colored movie scenes. The LCD technology, light source from CCFL (Cold Cathode Fluorescent Light) or white LED (latest version) shines through crystals panel and glasses layer, hard to achieve perfect black color because there is alway some light leakage in between pixels. Manufacturer keep improving with new technology and manufacturing advancement from generation to generation. Apart from better contrast with better ability to show perfect black, plasma screens do have wider viewing angles than LCD screens. Viewing angle mean how far you can sit on either side of screen before the image of screen disappear.
For LCD screen, some brightness and color shift happen when viewing angle is high (far from center of screen). Plasma screen have better viewing angle compare to LCD screen. Manufacturer are improving the lagging of LCD screen technology to catch up with Plasma screen technology, and steadily changing with more and better LCD screen technology entering the market, where now the viewing angles of some model of LCD screen is equal or better then plasma screen. Plasma produce brighter color too, compare to LCD screen due to light leakage on LCD between pixels that affecting its color saturation.
Advantages of Plasma over LCD technology
LCD screens tend to has blur images in fast moving scenes in action movie or sport due to slow switching time of crystals from black to white. While this was true for older generation LCD screens, new models have improve significantly and close the gap between these two technology. The lowest the switching time for LCD, the better the image quality in fast moving scenes. Currently there is some manufacturer claim their LCD TV switching time as low as 2ms, while typically 6ms switching time will provide good fast moving scenes. Another advantage of Plasma is low price for screen size larger than or equal to 42-inch. This has changed recently where LCDs’ price for screen size of above 42-inch are matching or even beating plasma in both resolution and price.
Advantages of LCD over Plasma technology
Apart from being price competitive, LCD has the edge over plasma in several other key areas. LCDs tend to have higher native resolution than plasmas of similar size, in layman term, it mean more pixels on same area of screen. LCDs also consume less power than plasma screens with estimated power saving of more than 30 percents. Except for greener for LCD technology, it weight lighter than similar sized plasma TV and making it more feasible to mount on wall. The lifespan of LCD TV out-perform plasma TV where plasma screen would lose half of their brightness after more than 20,000 hours of viewing. While almost all LCD TVs have lifespan of 60,000 hours or more. However, newer version of plasmas have bumped up that lifespan to between 30,000 and 60,000 hours. Plasma TV prone to screen burn effect if static image left display on screen too long and resulting the ghost of image burned in permanently to plasma screen. Newer plasma TV less susceptible to this with improved technology. LCD screen do not suffer from this due to the picture is display via changing crystals.
LCD or plasma the mainstream technology in market today?
Currently only 3 manufacturer continue to roll out new models of Plasma TV, there are Panasonic, Pioneer and Hitachi. For LCD TV, there are tones of manufacturer and the price had drop more than 15 percents year-on-year. If you look for better resolution, go for LCD TV. If you prefer big screen size with good image quality, but not on resolution, Plasma is the right choice for you. Today LCD TV manufacturer drive full HD (High Definition) as the selling point to fight Plasma TV, but now new version of Plasma TV do support 1080p high resolution. Despite the current HD buzz, the content available in 1080p is still very little and you are paying the premium price of Full-HD for future, not tmorrow.
Tablet PC Versus Laptops! Advantages and Limitations of Tablet PC and Laptops
Tablet PC versus Laptops : Tablets are predominantly designed to be the bridge between the mobile phone and laptop but definitely not to replace the laptop or computers. The same ways as how laptop cannot “completely” replace the desktop. If you see at the operating systems of mobile there are only three real players: Windows Phone 7, Android and iOS. Other two operating systems for mobile are WebOS and BlackBerry but both of them are losing their popularity where the WebOS is almost at lowest in percentage of use. These platforms are used well both on tablets (not Windows Phone 7 yet) as well as on Smartphone and they quite sync well with each other.
Advantages and Limitations of Tablet PC and Laptops
Tablets has the convenience of portability and easier to take around for personal or official use. For students to take around in their college campus tablets are comfortable than a laptop or a computer. But once you are back home the laptop or desktop becomes the primary system for everything however your tablet information can be synced to your system (laptop or computer) so that you can always rest peacefully having a backup if something happens to your tablet memory.
So, it is technically understood that tablets cannot be more successful than laptops but it is definite that tablets make certain things easier however the common desktop or laptop cannot be washed out really as it is still a necessity if you need true processing power in accomplishing tasks like graphics rendering, programming, software engineering, etc.
The advantages of tablet over laptop are always concerned with ones’ need. Today there are a lot of people who never care owning a laptop as a Tablet PC covers their need though they have certain limitation but the users’ need might be accomplished within the limitations. If a huge screen or a gaming level graphics support is your need then a laptop could be the choice. On the other hand if you need a mobile computer to use while standing, walking, lounging etc, only a Tablet PC can accompany you for your needs. In meetings or in classrooms to make drawings, take notes, markup documents, scribble items etc without any doubt Tablets are the device that suits your requirement.
No confusion over Tablet PC versus laptops as Tablets are just PCs without mouse and can be operated through touch-screen monitor. In terms of PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) a Tablet PC can replace your laptop which is smaller than notebook and is a portable computer but knowing the advantages of its portability its obvious that it has got limitations too. Back home it is laptop that can fit your needs, surprisingly the wise use of both tablets and laptop can secure your data and both can act as backup devices and keeping your day worry-free.
CES 2012: review of new devices from Motorola!
CES 2012: review of new devices from Motorola!
We continue to meet with the presented at CES 2012 innovations. Scale and the announcement was noted by Motorola Mobility, which is now owned by Google. Under its brand in the near future will come five new Android-smartphone.
All models are updated range of Motorola, of course, running Android. Despite this predictability, there is much to see and what surprised. Results showed four new Motorola handset, or rather, even the four "and a half." One of smartphones, which brought with Motorola, was not a novelty, and previously released a device with a slightly updated look.
Motorola DROID 4
Successor of the famous line of DROID, which is better known in our area as MILESTONE, is the number 4 smartphone. Sad, but he, like DROID 3, is designed exclusively for the U.S. operator Verizon. The device was radio, which supports not only the networks CDMA, and GSM, so that with a strong desire to use them will be in our country, however, "gray" ways. In addition, it is one of the pioneers of network LTE, so that the machine is about to tell in detail.
Many journalists have already called DROID best available today klaviaturnikov. With this you can bet. However, if not the best, then one of his best deservedly be called. As with all previous Android-smartphone from Motorola, at the time of his appearance, he largely avoids the competition on the part of the hardware.
|
Motorola DROID 4 |
|
| Form Factor | QWERTY-slider |
| Operating system | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) |
| Processor | CPU TI OMAP 4430, two core, 1.2 GHz + GPU PowerVR GSX540 |
| Memory | 1 GB RAM, 16 GB + slot microSDHC (up to 32 GB) |
| Mobile communication / data transfer | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, CDMA, GPRS / EDGE, UMTS 2100 MHz, HSDPA (up to 14.4 Mbit / s), HSUPA (up to 5.76 Mbit / s), LTE |
| Screen | TFT (capacitive sensor), 4-inch diagonal, resolution 540h960, 16 million colors |
| Interfaces | USB 2.0 (microUSB), Wi-Fi 802.11 b / g / n, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS / A-GPS |
| Camera | 8 megapixel, autofocus, flash, video recording FullHD- |
| Battery | Li-Ion, removable, 1785 mAh |
| Dimensions and weight | 127 x 63 x 12.7 mm, 179 g |
In hardware terms of innovation is consistent with modern ideas about how to be smart in business class. Powerful dual core processor, large memory capacity, ample storage for content and support the most advanced data networks is clearly spoken in favor of what we see is one of the best examples in his weight class. And with the release of update Ice Cream Sandwich DROID four more will be even closer to the privileged club of the best smartphones of today. But note that relative to the previous model, the device has undergone significant changes are not so. Remained the same display, camera, processor (except clock), and most wireless capabilities.
Design a painfully familiar, at least three previous models DROID. The body is made from high quality black plastic, which is typical for models of the business class. In terms of the size of a smartphone has become a little wider and longer, but significantly gained weight, albeit a little "lost." The screen is quite good, but nothing more. Below the display are four keys typical for Android. And in the center of attention, of course, QWERTY-keyboard.
The large square keys are somewhat similar to the island keyboard laptops. Each of them is illuminated white, not only through the applied notation, but also on the perimeter.

Sidebar Motorola DROID 4
In terms of ergonomics, smart and on top. Confused, of course, its considerable weight, but strong masculine hands (and DROID obviously not created for women), it is quite appropriate. In addition, the large display makes operation very easy. Sales of Motorola DROID 4 start in the first quarter of 2012. I think that, like all the "drones", this smartphone will become very popular, especially at home.
Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
Another Android-smartphone, which has brought Motorola to exhibit significantly stands out from the crowd of numerous such devices with one unique index - huge capacity battery.
RAZR MAXX does not have analogues on this indicator. It was no joke: the battery capacity is 3300 mAh. However, the smartphone has other advantages.
|
Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX |
|
| Form Factor | monoblock |
| Operating system | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) |
| Processor | CPU TI OMAP 4430, two core, 1.2 GHz + GPU PowerVR GSX540 |
| Memory | 1 GB RAM, 16 GB + slot microSDHC (up to 32 GB) |
| Mobile communication / data transfer | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, CDMA, GPRS / EDGE, UMTS 2100 MHz, HSDPA (up to 14.4 Mbit / s), HSUPA (up to 5.76 Mbit / s), LTE |
| Screen | Super AMOLED (capacitive sensor), the diagonal of 4.3 inches, resolution 540h960, 16 million colors |
| Interfaces | USB 2.0 (microUSB), Wi-Fi 802.11 b / g / n, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS / GLONASS, HMDI |
| Camera | 8 megapixel, autofocus, flash, video recording FullHD- |
| Battery | Li-Ion, removable, 3300 mAh |
| Dimensions and weight | 130.7 x 68.9 x 9 mm, 145 g |
It is amazing how the creators managed to equip the DROID RAZR MAXX such a big battery with such a modest scale. Externally, the smartphone is very similar to all other devices of the family DROID, but compares favorably with a small thickness. The structure of the body resembles that of Nokia N8 through the beveled corners.

Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX in perspective
In general, a fairly wide body, which is not surprising, given the screen size - 4.3 inches. The display is very good: large size, high resolution and technology Super AMOLED screen makes DROID RAZR MAXX one of the best available today. Reserve enough brightness for comfortable operation, even in bright sunlight. If you add a cover glass Gorilla Glass, it turns almost ideal. Underneath the display are identical to the previous model sensor control keys.
It makes no sense to describe the hardware platform, it is almost identical DROID 4. However, there is one major difference (besides the aforementioned battery pack). It is a combined navigation module, which, in addition to GPS, has supported the Russian GLONASS system.

The thickness of Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX clearly
In terms of ergonomics smartphone is questionable impression. On the one hand - and a great quality screen, slim body and a huge battery life. On the other - larger sizes that make DROID RAZR MAXX is not very welcome in your pocket. However, in recent years in the world mobilprome tendency to produce smartphones with even larger dimensions, so that in the context HTC Titan and Samsung Galaxy Note, our hero is not such a major one. Everything is relative after all.
Battery life is fascinating. In offline mode, the phone can remain operational for more than two weeks, and the talk time - 21 hours. The latter figure is by far a record. What, in fact, sought Motorola, encroaching on the laurels of Philips and supplying DROID RAZR MAXX so capacious battery.
As DROID 4, novelty is intended primarily for Verizon and will be available in the coming months. About the Russian market still can not hear anything, but let's hope that soon we will be able to see it.
Motorola Defy Mini
Motorola smartphone has got another device that is protected from external influences, along with the Defy and Defy +. New feature called Motorola Defy Mini, which explicitly makes it clear that it is somewhat easier than with the older models.

Motorola Defy Mini in a "natural" form
The main advantage of these smart phones - their security, not the hardware. Obviously, the Defy Mini substantially loses released a few months ago Sony Ericsson Xperia Active.
|
Motorola Defy Mini |
|
| Form Factor | monoblock |
| Operating system | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) |
| Processor | One core clock frequency of 600 MHz |
| Memory | 512 MB RAM, 512 MB ROM + slot microSDHC (up to 32 GB) |
| Mobile communication / data transfer | GSM / UMTS 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, GPRS / EDGE, HSDPA / HSUPA |
| Screen | TFT (capacitive sensor), 3.2-inch diagonal, 320x480 resolution, 16 million colors |
| Interfaces | USB 2.0 (microUSB), Wi-Fi 802.11 b / g / n, Bluetooth 2.1, GPS / A-GPS |
| Camera | 3.2 MP, flash, video recording |
| Battery | Li-Ion, removable, 1650 mAh |
| Dimensions and weight | 109 x 58.5 x 12.6 mm, 107 g |
Very much in the hardware stuffing your smartphone to date looks archaic. In particular this applies to the camera.

Faceplate Motorola Defy Mini
Does not inspire confidence and weak by today's standards processor with a clock frequency of 600 MHz. However, it has also a positive point: very long battery - for three weeks. The screen uses a TFT-matrix, and has a modest resolution of 320x480, which is typical for displays, entry-level smartphones. On top of it is protected by glass Gorilla Glass.

The rear panel Motorola Defy Mini
In terms of appearance Motorola Defy Mini is simple and somewhat similar to cheap smartphones Samsung. The body is made of soft touch plastic, black and silver. By the way, would not be quite correct to make the smartphone from the expensive and spectacular-looking materials, if known in advance that he will fall into various scrapes. Nevertheless, the aforementioned Xperia Active looks much more effective.
As for the Motorola Defy Mini as a companion for outdoor enthusiasts, here he must show himself very well. Protected on all sides, so even with the battery life, the smartphone will have on the disposition of this category of users. European sales of the device will start in February. Price is not specified.
Motorola Motoluxe
The latest novelty, cooked for us by Motorola, is a compromise between functionality and price - I must say, very good compromise. When the external effectiveness and good value complete Motorola Motoluxe be significantly lower than in solutions with similar functionality from other manufacturers. Most likely, the U.S. and Europe smartphone will be issued free of charge at the conclusion of a two-year contract.

Faceplate Motorola Motoluxe
I must say that Motoluxe not quite correct to call a novelty. In November last year, the smartphone was introduced in China under the name XT615, but the market still do not have time. Perhaps the sale of two twin brothers will begin at the same time.
|
Motorola Motoluxe |
|
| Form Factor | monoblock |
| Operating system | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) |
| Processor | CPU Qualcomm MSM7227, 800MHz + GPU Adreno 200 |
| Memory | 512 MB RAM, 1 GB ROM + slot microSDHC (up to 32 GB) |
| Mobile communication / data transfer | GSM / UMTS 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, GPRS / EDGE, HSDPA / HSUPA |
| Screen | TFT (capacitive sensor), 4-inch diagonal, resolution 480h854, 16 million colors |
| Interfaces | USB 2.0 (microUSB), Wi-Fi 802.11 b / g / n, Bluetooth 3.0, GPS / A-GPS |
| Camera | 8 MP, flash, video recording |
| Battery | Li-Ion, removable 1400 mAh |
| Dimensions and weight | 117.7 x 60.5 x 9.9 mm, 124 g |
Motoluxe austere but elegant. Housing smartphone rectangular shape with a slight rounding at the corners. In general, look pretty attractive, but the device will look good only in male hands. The body is made from high quality plastic, which has little texture, reminiscent of a book cover.

Motorola Motoluxe. Back view
Front panel of the smartphone is very similar to that of the first model, DROID, but has its own "twist" in the form of asymmetry in the lower part. For management, but the touch screen, there are all the same four softkeys. The display itself is good, but far from ideal - it is a large, standard-definition 854h480, but is made by TFT technology and is not well read in the sun.
In hardware terms this is an easy dissonance. Motoluxe was not the most advanced processor with 800 MHz and 512 MB of RAM. Due to the fact that the processor is already rather out of date, smartphone, equipped with an excellent 8-megapixel camera can not capture video either in 1080p, or even at 720p. Well, the trade-offs are not always pleasant. With regard to communications, they are at a decent level.

Motorola Motoluxe
Ergonomics at the height of the smartphone. This is facilitated by the optimal size and a fresh user interface Moto Switch 2.0, which is the next stage of development Motoblur. Overall impression of the device are also positive, except for some hardware nuances that I wrote above. Sales of Motorola Motoluxe, as Defy Mini, will start in February. Unfortunately, the price not yet known.
Results
Motorola well prepared for CES 2012. Presented novelty can meet the needs of almost any user. Among others, the only openly female model, which, however, is not so bad: the company released earlier with ultra-slim RAZR which now will be sold in a pretty purple color.

Motorola RAZR in the purple version
Due to such wide coverage of Motorola can improve their situation, which in recent years has been so disappointing that led to the accession of the company to Google. Of course, everything will depend on the value of new products, but it is likely that prices will be adequate.
CES 2012: Hot news on Windows Phone 7 HTC Titan II and Nokia Lumia 900
A typical course for many producers - to present their new products (if not all, at least part of) the day before the exhibition. Thus party guarantees attention from the media do not risk that his newsroom occasion get lost among the others. So it was at CES, so it will be at MWC.
Nokia Lumia 900
At different times, so there were a variety of companies, well, in case the current in these days of CES 2012 in Las Vegas on that path went Nokia, announced the new smartphone Lumia WP7-900. Numbering of models is logical to assume that this is a direct heir Lumia 800, issued in October last year. However, when meeting with the novelty, it is clear that it is not a typical example of the update. Innovation is not so much.

Lumia 900 Nokia booth at CES 2012
Take, for example, the external appearance. It seems that Nokia decided to consolidate corporate identity Lumia, unify it for the line. By the hallmark series include Unibody-housing and polycarbonate as the main material used. We liked design N9, and then Lumia 800 - just like Lumia and 900. The smartphone is pleasant to the touch, gives the impression of a strong, sustained damage to the model. In addition, it is very ergonomic: rounded side faces, rather than upper and lower bounds (as it is often). The exhibition joke that Nokia has decided to be different from the Apple and therefore "licked" the other angles - but objectively it is a very good solution.
If we compare the Lumia Lumia 900 800, it is important to note two differences. First - it's increased dimensions: 127.8 x 68.5 x 11.5 mm to 116.5 x 61.2 x 12.1 mm. As can be seen on the characteristics of the new smartphone even a little thinner than its predecessor. Weight increased from 142 to 160 grams, which, of course, well there. The second addition - the front camera for video calls. Its resolution is 1 megapixel.
Characteristics of the main camera have not changed: an 8-megapixel module with optics Carl Zeiss, 28mm and aperture 2.2. The user also has a dual LED flash.
We now turn to the display. It is because of the display Lumia Lumia larger 900 Steel 800. As in many other models of hi-end level, the screen is protected by glass Gorilla Glass. Matrix is the technology Super AMOLED, in addition, Nokia says the use of technology ClearBlack. The technology comes to having a special coating on the screen that makes blacks more profound (as in the plasma TV). By definition pictures Lumia 900 and inferior to his "cousin", and iPhone 4/4S, and in the future - the new flagship Android-smartphone models from different manufacturers with conventional standard resolution of 1280x720 pixels.
In terms of hardware features Lumia 900 does not offer anything new - it has a single core processor with Scorpion 1.4 GHz, a graphics accelerator Adreno 205. RAM is 512 MB, 16 GB user. This built-in memory, no expansion slots, like Nokia Lumia 800 and Nokia N9.
But perhaps the most fundamental difference between 900 and Lumia Lumia 800 - support for LTE. Recall the use of LTE networks can download data at speeds up to 50 Mbit / s, send up to 25 Mbit / sec. For comparison, using the profile of HSPA + Speed transfer and shipment will be 21 and 5.76 Mbit / s, respectively.

Nokia Lumia 900
The software also does not include anything new. In the role of the software platform is still used Windows Phone 7.5 Mango, with the already familiar interface Metro. Nokia expanded its range of standard software applications Nokia Maps, Nokia Drive, designed for navigation. Also in the standard package added proprietary applications CNN and ESPN, which met earlier in the Symbian-smartphones Nokia.
What is interesting is entered into an agreement with EA release 20 games for Windows Phone. As the release of these games will get their first smartphone was Lumia - a bonus that Nokia will try to distinguish themselves from other manufacturers in the category of Windows Phone. The advantage, in our opinion very questionable.
Lumia 900 is primarily intended for the U.S. market. This is shown by many factors: the "keynote address," Elop intention to re-discover America, and start selling it at one of the U.S. operators (AT & T) c likely delay the European release, and, finally, the rate at LTE. So far, this profile is not used actively network in Europe and across the Atlantic.
HTC Titan II
One day, the Nokia HTC has demonstrated its LTE-smartphone on the Windows Phone Mango - Titan II. It seems, CES 2012 will mark a new round of competition among manufacturers of smart phones - now the focus is on technology, LTE. On the one hand, this is due to reach maximum level in the technology race, on the other - by the spread and put into commercial operation in the fourth-generation networks around the world.
A little before we became acquainted with the novelty Nokia Lumia 900, which was found to not be symbolic of changes compared to its predecessor - Lumia 800. Titan II, by contrast, would be interesting even without the support networks of LTE.

HTC Titan II
Like the original Titan, a new smartphone is very big, if not great. The display is as much as 4.7 inches, and perhaps this is a reasonable maximum for that device was a smartphone. A little more, and would have made smartshet like Samsung Galaxy Note.
The developers managed to reduce the weight of the new model smartphone with 160 g to 147 Virtually the entire body is made of a Titan II for HTC traditional plastic with soft-touch coating. Externally, Titan II is a little fresher predecessor, as the foreground color is selected body light gray.
Display settings are compared with the original model did not change. With such an impressive diagonal matrix resolution is no longer in wow-effect. It remains at 800x480 pixels. It turns out that the density of pixels in this display is 199 pixels / inch. Most fans will have a clear picture is not for everyone. Fortunately, this is the only major gripe with respect to the display - the rest of the Super LCD matrix pleases. Color reproduction and rich at the same time natural, viewing angles close to 180 degrees.
The hardware is also not new news - it's Scorpion processor with 1.5 GHz, 512 MB of RAM. With the addition of a module LTE in Titan II uses an updated chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon S2. Titan II software also devoid of any novelty - used a well-known operating system Windows Phone 7.5 Mango.

HTC Titan II
In addition to supporting LTE, a Titan II is another strong trump card. This is his camera. Its resolution sets new record for mobile devices and up to 16 megapixels. Thus, the maximum photo resolution is 4640 x 3480 pixels. Photomodule built on the sensor on the back illumination for better quality when shooting in dim light. Judging by the first reviews, Titan II could claim leadership not only in the race numbers - the quality of received frames exceeds photos, taken on other smartphones. Argue with him on the picture quality can Sony Xperia S and iPhone 4S. However, both the smartphone markedly inferior to the resolution.
The smartphone allows you to record video at resolutions up to 720p (sorry, that was not implemented support for Full HD). In addition, there is a front camera with a resolution of 1.3 megapixels, which is slightly better than the Nokia Lumia 900.
CES 2012: Tablet Lenovo and other Android-news
Lenovo products on the Tablet market has not been widely represent
ed. But the company is clearly trying to produce innovative solutions that can move it forward. At CES 2012 was seen several of these.
To present a truly unique product that can outshine even "unattainable» iPad, but at least something from Samsung, Lenovo has not yet succeeded. But the company is trying, and obviously not going to give up what we see on those shown at CES 2012 solutions.
Lenovo IdeaTab S2 caused a feeling of deja vu. Just open the review ASUS Transformer Prime, to determine the causes of such feelings. However, it is unlikely ASUS will be sued for copying the design (hello, Apple!) - Devices still differ, and are similar only in the idea.

Lenovo IdeaPad S2
So, IdeaTab S2 - a 10-inch tablet based on Android 4.0, which comes with a keyboard, a dock, where there are additional connectors and battery.
Specs do not differ from the actual counterparts - for example, a brand new 28 nm dual-core processor Qualcomm Snapdragon, clocked at 1.5 GHz. The thickness of the shell plate is only 8.7 mm, and weight - 580 grams. All this is quite good, but some of our competitors have gradually master the quad "open spaces".

Lenovo IdeaPad S2. Back view
Of the other characteristics can be identified using IPS-matrix for the 10-inch screen resolution of 1280x800. Also nothing special, as is the case with one gigabyte of RAM. The volume of solid-state disk does not exceed the value of 64 GB. Also promise to plug microHDMI, 5.0 and 1.3-megapixel rear camera and front, respectively. Well, Doc, apart from additional 9:00 of autonomy, would provide the owner of the tablet a couple of ports, USB, card reader for full-size cards SD, keyboard and touchpad.
Much more interesting is the tablet Lenovo LePad K2010 (or IdeaTab K2). In size it is almost the same - 10.1 inch display, although the device has a frame slightly wider than the S2. More importantly - a screen resolution of 1920x1200 pixels. Matrix type - IPS. With similar products made only as long as Acer (IconiaTab A700), so that Lenovo in the forefront.
As the processor uses a brand new quad-core NVIDIA Tegra 3, clocked at 1.3 or 1.6 GHz (depending on the modification of the tablet.) Throw in 2GB of RAM, and Android 4.0 and obtain one of the most advanced devices on the market. The only pity is that so far he «China only» - exclusive to Asia.

Lenovo LePad S2005
For a more mainstream Lenovo already made the plates showed LePad S2005, S2007 and S2010. First, we recall, something like the acclaimed 5.3-inch smartphone (or tablet yet?) Samsung Galaxy Note. S2005 is worth almost as much, but clearly more modest performance. Thus, the screen resolution at this "lepada" only 800x480 at 5 inches diagonally against a 1280x800 Note. Throw in Android 2.3.5, 1.2 GHz dual-core processor, gigabytes of RAM, and you get interesting, but slightly overpriced model.

Lenovo LePad S2010 and S2007
Lenovo S2007 and S2010 are the most ordinary tablets based on Android 3.2. The first is equipped with a 7-inch screen, while the second - a 10-inch. Both resolution of 1280x800 pixels, matrix type - IPS. Qualcomm dual-core processor 1.5 GHz, 1 GB of RAM and a pair of cameras are also included.

Lenovo S2
The smartphone market in general, while Lenovo bypasses. It is not surprising - without relevant experience do they have nothing. Example HP to excellent confirmation. But the novelty company still presented. This time she managed without the series and just called the phone S2.
S2 - pretty nice tube with a rounded upper end and a 3.8-inch WVGA-screen. It features a dual-core 1.4 GHz processor Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8255. It is expected that the new product will be available in two versions: the first - with 512 MB of RAM and 8 GB of flash memory, while the second option would double these values. In addition to standard microUSB connector and 3.5 mm audiodzheka present microHDMI. Rear camera has a good resolution of 8 MP. While that is installed on a smartphone Android 2.3, but updated to version 4.0 is also planned.

Lenovo IdeaTV K91
And at the end of a few words about another Android-devayse shown Lenovo at CES 2012 - TV IdeaTV K91. Novelty is declared as the world's first TV with Android 4.0. Inside it hides a 1.5GHz dual-core chip Qualcomm Snapdragon APQ8060, 1 GB RAM, 8 GB of flash memory. In general, the usual smartphone or tablet, with only a 55-inch non-touch screen. In addition, the TV set displayed a card reader SD, 100 Mbit / s port Ethernet, HDMI, connectors USB, at the same time there is a built Wi-Fi controller. IdeaTV is something of a "smart TV", which today sell Samsung, LG, Philips and other manufacturers. Lenovo so far in this market is not seen, but the way she said it chose not bad - Android still active in this field does not apply.
Lenovo IdeaTab S2
What changes in electronics and social are waiting for the world in the next decade?
From 25 to 29 January in Davos will be held next Economic Forum. In his chapter will take part of Cisco, John Chambers (John Chambers). Preparing for a trip to Switzerland, he published his thoughts on what awaits humanity in the next 10 years.
What changes are waiting for the world in the next decade?
Without a doubt, the main driving force behind the upcoming changes will become intelligent network and the Internet. Changes associated with the development of network technology, will affect many areas - from work and entertainment to health, employment and job placement, life in general.
New technological solutions will not only contribute to the modernization of various sectors of the economy, but also to stimulate GDP growth, increasing productivity and creating jobs.
In addition, great interest is how the technologies work together to evolve cloud solutions, one of the most relevant technological trends.
Not very promising union developments in video and business architectures. This opens new possibilities in areas such as health, education, manufacturing, and the like. One of the challenging tasks in the further development is to establish a direct relationship between expertise and concrete results, apparent to the end user.
What technologies will contribute to the transformation?
Perhaps the most striking technological trend of modern times is associated with the ability to access any Content through any device («any device to any content»). Another notable trend becomes widespread use of video («video everything»). Videos will not be just a way of communicating, but a means to change management in IT and business. Network solutions for video help build new business models using social networks. Resources such as Twitter, Facebook and Youtube, will be an effective tool for collaboration in the workplace.
Along with the ubiquitous video will play an important role mobility. Ability to access any content from any device on your network secure channel - a new requirement of the time. We expect a further increase in the number of mobile devices, which increases the demands on the network and network security.
Finally, the third direction associated with the upcoming changes - is the spread of products and solutions that provide the most rapid and efficient transformation of architectures for business. These solutions can integrate new technologies into existing network infrastructure that enables improved business model in accordance with actual needs.
How organizations create a competitive innovation?
The basis for further change are innovations aimed at improving technologies and operations. "About ten years ago we started the project in the field of education in Jordan, - says John Chambers. - He demonstrated the effectiveness of the interaction of various organizations to achieve common goals. We are currently working closely with the Russian government, the process of modernizing the economy and infrastructure of the country by the creation of innovative industries. One of the key factors of modernization in Russia is the project "Skolkovo" which, by analogy with the competition for the award with the support of innovation Skolkovo CiscoI-PRIZE, to accumulate the best business plans of citizens to create the country's innovation economy. "
Also a good example of the innovation to increase efficiency and quality of life can serve as a partnership with Cisco's various universities in the world. Thus, having supported the governor of Virginia, four local University have created a network infrastructure that allows teachers to conduct classes simultaneously at several universities and thereby compensate for funding cuts.
So, waiting for humankind in the next decade, the changes due to the influence of network technologies in various spheres of life.
What joint actions can take the organization to solve world problems?
To change and improve life on earth are important communication and bringing people together. The young generation has a unique experience in social networks. No less important is the integration of people belonging to different social groups, including by means of technological solutions for the communications. This association does not just help solve social problems and adequately confront global threats, but will also help create jobs that will influence the further development of the global economy. Overcoming disunity between the people will give an opportunity to rethink the future evolution of areas such as health and education.
Testing Apple iPhone 4S
For a start - look at the specifications.
| iPhone 4 | iPhone 4S | |
| Screen (size in inches, type of matrix) / resolution pixels | 3,5 ", IPS / 960 × 640 | 3,5 ", IPS / 960 × 640 |
| System on a chip (SoC) / number and speed of processor cores | Apple A4 / 1 core 1 GHz | Apple A5 / 2 cores at 1GHz |
| RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Operating system | iOS 4 (a free upgrade to iOS 5) | iOS 5 + intelligent assistant Siri |
| Flash memory | from 8 GB to 32 GB | from 16 GB to 64 GB |
| The rear camera | 5 megapixel (photo) / 720p (video) | 8 MP (pictured) / 1080p (video) |
| Weight (g) | 140 | 140 |
Speaking about the new features in iPhone 4S, Apple a little disingenuous, adding to them the possibility of iOS 5. Slyness, we believe that, for the reason that iOS 5 is free to put on the iPhone 4, and even on 3GS, as well as on the last two generations of iPod touch. In the near future, we will prepare a separate article, which describe in detail about the new features iOS 5. Now we just focus on the unique features of iPhone 4S and its differences from the previous model .
Equipment, design and screen
iPhone 4S comes in a box, almost identical in appearance package with the iPhone 4. The fact that this is a new model that shows only the letter S in a silver box (on the left and right sides of the box) and the icon at the bottom iCloud (front) side.
Inside the box, all the familiar and predictable: headset, cable for PC connection, battery charger (note that if you buy iPhone abroad or in the "gray" of suppliers, you have to buy an adapter for the plug). Two booklets, located in a white envelope, containing a minimum of information and useful unless the newcomers, but the metal clip is useful for the SIM-card. As in last year's model, it uses MicroSIM.
As for the appearance of the iPhone, then he compared with the previous year has remained virtually unchanged. Is that a bit has changed the location of some elements on the side of the metal edging (for example, mute button now to a few millimeters below). But it shows more about changing the location of the phone antenna, which was announced at the presentation.
Like the iPhone 4, the new model is available in white and black colors.

For people who like to show others the latest gadgets, the disappointment is the fact that the new iPhone is nowhere stated that this model is 4S, instead of 4. Therefore, you would not tell a person with iPhone 4S in the hands of the owner of the iPhone 4.

The screen also remained unchanged. However, why change when competitors for the year could not oppose anything the iPhone 4 in this parameter? The number of dots per inch (328) remains inaccessible to other manufacturers, and, moreover, IPS-matrix (or something similar in color reproduction and viewing angles) can also be found far from everywhere. However, in fairness, we note that at the instance of iPhone 4S, which was on our test, the screen was a little lighter than the iPhone 4. But first, it can be seen only in a direct comparison, and secondly, it may be simply due to the fact that the screens of different parties. Not be ruled out that if we took another iPhone 4, there would have been too light a screen.
Performance
Another widely publicized feature of the new iPhone - performance. Apple has equipped the new smart SoC Apple A5, which, unlike the A4, a dual-core. Thus, if the iPhone 4 in performance approximately equivalent to the first iPad, iPhone 4S then got to the iPad 2. Let's check in practice, how significant growth has turned out!
In comparison, will participate iPhone 4S, iPhone 4, and last year's iPod touch. All three devices were running iOS 5.0. At the same time, by the way, check to see how critical the smaller the amount of RAM in the iPod touch. As a benchmark we used the following applications from the App Store: 3D Benchmark (3DBench), GLBenchmark 2.1.0 (trial version), GeekBench 2.1.9 (trial version), CPUBench and Linpack Benchmark. In addition, we used a browser-test SunSpider 0.9.1. So, what do we got?
Free 3D Benchmark uses vosmisekundnuyu stage of the game Defend London (you can buy it in the App Store). Unfortunately, the duration of the test can not be adjusted. So plan ahead for a large error. We ran the test on each device three times. The table shows the best results for each participant. The top line - the number of frames per second, lower - the time of the test.
| iPhone 4S | iPhone 4 | iPod touch in 2010 |
| 60,192486 fps | 59,285522 fps | 56,542412 fps |
| 8,290071 sec. | 8,416895 sec. | 8,825233 sec. |
As you can see, the results do not differ much. In this case, the error in the case of the iPhone 4S was less than 1 frame per second (the worst outcome - 60,120571 fps). The iPhone 4 error was around 2 fps, while the iPod touch as much as the scatter of results was 5 fps (worst start - 51,357391 fps). How to interpret the results of the test 3D Benchmark? In principle, it is clear that the iPhone 4S all starts better than the iPhone 4, while the iPod touch - worse than both the iPhone. But, first, the difference is really very small (approximately at the level of error). And secondly, it clearly does not disclose the performance of iPhone 4S in full.
The next benchmark will GLBenchmark 2.1.0. This is a serious professional test, which is used in Apple. For clarity, we present the results in Table 4 and only iPhone iPhone 4S, as to the results of iPod touch, then, looking ahead, say that they are almost identical to the iPhone 4 (and, incidentally, proves that the game no fundamental difference between the iPhone 4 the last generation iPod and not).
| iPhone 4 | iPhone 4S | |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt (Standart) | 1623 frame | 6575 frame |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt (High) | 1200 frame | 6517 frame |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt (Fixed Time) | 210 639 msec | 47 931 msec |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt (Offscreen) | 1282 frame | 8248 frame |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 PRO (Standart) | 1107 frame | 2951 frame |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 PRO (High) | 881 frame | 2924 frame |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 PRO (Fixed Time) | 65 384 msec | 20 971 msec |
| GLBenchmark 2.1 PRO (Offscreen) | 898 frame | 6162 frame |
| Swap buffer test (swap buffer) | 599 frame | 599 frame |
| Fill test (texture fetch) | 155464932 texel / sec | 793450112 texel / sec |
| Triginometric test (vertex weighted) | 1000034 vertex / sec | 3009531 vertex / sec |
| Triginometric test (fragment weighted) | 1166851 fragment / sec | 4264610 fragment / sec |
| Triginometric test (balanced) | 1005977 shader / sec | 3267608 shader / sec |
| Exponential test (vertex weighted) | 3060126 vertex / sec | 7724229 vertex / sec |
| Exponential test (fragment weighted) | 3899827 fragment / sec | 15713243 fragment / sec |
| Exponential test (balanced) | 1718102 shader / sec | 13291464 shader / sec |
| Common test (vertex weighted) | 1520442 vertex / sec | 5330342 vertex / sec |
| Common test (fragment weighted) | 1691164 fragment / sec | 4912324 fragment / sec |
| Common test (balanced) | 943 732 shader / sec | 4656304 shader / sec |
| Geometric test (vertex weighted) | 1931631 vertex / sec | 6670891 vertex / sec |
| Geometric test (fragment weighted) | 2246119 fragment / sec | 7579986 fragment / sec |
| Geometric test (balanced) | 1213080 shader / sec | 6537624 shader / sec |
| For loop test (vertex weighted) | 3875164 vertex / sec | 7671772 vertex / sec |
| For loop test (fragment weighted) | 4933746 fragment / sec | 19137150 fragment / sec |
| For loop test (balanced) | 2494991 shader / sec | 15227929 shader / sec |
| Branching test (vertex weighted) | 5074099 vertex / sec | 7579216 vertex / sec |
| Branching test (fragment weighted) | 8776278 fragment / sec | 34851320 fragment / sec |
| Branching test (balanced) | 2851854 shader / sec | 14889438 shader / sec |
| Array test (uniform array access) | 3449388 vertex / sec | 7757428 vertex / sec |
| Triangle test (while) | 1634582 triangle / sec | 50013768 triangle / sec |
| Triangle test (textured) | 17327119 triangle / sec | 42646156 triangle / sec |
| Triangle test (textured, vertex lit) | 9729267 triangle / sec | 37657680 triangle / sec |
| Triangle test (textured, fragment lit) | 6235942 triangle / sec | 37398232 triangle / sec |
So, what do we see? iPhone 4S just utterly breaks last year's model. In subtest Egypt, simulating game episode, iPhone 4S surpasses the iPhone 4 in 5-7 times! In subtest PRO difference in 3-6 times. If you look at other tests, we can only gain a foothold in the opinion of the superiority of iPhone 4S. It is not excluded that Apple somehow specially optimized for iPhone 4S is passing the test. But in any case, the result is eloquent. Please note that this test GLBenchmark graphics subsystem. Therefore, this performance difference will be felt only in those applications, which actively involve the graphics hardware acceleration.
Now let's see how things are with the performance of processor cores and memory. To do this, run the test GeekBench 2.1.9 for iPhone OS (this is a multi-platform test, it does exist in versions for Mac OS X and Windows, however, the version of the iOS have to buy separately).
LED products provide the latest in column focus technology in a great price
A few LED bulbs are it takes to create an extremely high-powered column, allowing manufacturers to create very compact handheld lights, such since the Coast LED Lenser torch.Another reason BROUGHT products are gaining interest are for their incredible efficiency. Led’s create more light for each watt than normal incandescent bulbs, making them ideal for hand held products. Led’s are additionally very durable because of their nature as strong state components; they're hard to harm with external surprise. And lastly, but probably most of all, they have an extremely long life.
Before we take a look at how LED torches create a law enforcement officer's life much easier, however, let's explore the actual recent history from the remarkable LED.LED tactical torches really are a fairly new offshoot associated with traditional LED programs. When LED's had been first introduced these were used primarily with regard to practical high-power programs, such as flashlights, region lighting, and indicator lights on electronics.LED lights come in a number of colors and kinds, including infrared, noticeable, or ultraviolet.LED lights also have gained popularity because grow lights with regard to indoor plants and therefore are also used in order to sterilize and disinfect drinking water and solid ingredients.
Their brilliant beams help cops search dark as well as dangerous areas properly. The durability associated with LED's allows officers to become a lot harder on the torches or flashlights and never have to worry about the actual bulb breaking. And their lengthy lives mean officers do not have to worry about their own torch going out in the center of a darkened research.LED For Non-Violent Group Control arch and rescue isn't the only real use for LED's that police force agents rely upon. High-frequency flashing LED’s happening to be used recently as an effective form of non-violent group control.
Known like a storming tactical flashlight, or LED incapacitation, this device employs a number of super bright pulses, strobes, gentle frequencies, and colors to confuse as well as disorient an assailant or riotous mafia. Although these devices continue to be fairly experimental, test trials possess proved promising and also the LED lenser flashlight incapacitation might soon be because common a non-lethal tool as tear gasoline, pepper spray or even Tasters.
Coast brand LED products provide the latest in column focus technology in a great price. It is no wonder, after that, that law enforcement officers use Coast over and over for all their own LED lighting requirements. The advanced concentrate system Coast developed within their LED Lenser HEWLETT PACKARD P7, for example, provides a dramatically focused beam with a variety of up to 1, 750 feet and it is "a major advance in flashlight concentrating technology, " based on Coast president Donald Brands. No longer may users see darkish or hot spots within their flashlight beam. Inch LED lighting items have come quite a distance since their invention within the early 1900s.Police force officers have discovered LED's crucial in nearly every aspect of their own jobs, from a regimen traffic stop in the center of the night to some high-risk search-and-rescue procedure. This article is posted by peter yin (111017)
HP Elitebook 8740w review. HP Elitebook 8740w – working effectively!
1. Specification andDesign.
In this time of testing came just two versions of one model, the so-called Mobile WorkStation, - HP Elitebook 8740w, which differ only video cards - NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M and the ATI FirePro M7820, but otherwise they are identical: to 8 GB of RAM and 500 GB disk space, as well as quad-core Intel Core i7-740QM. Of course, there are many versions with different processors and RAM, but for the possibility of direct comparison were selected as similar, but with video cards from different manufacturers. On account of NVIDIA - CUDA technology and 256-bit bus, and the adapter ATI boasts DirectX 11 vs. DX10, NVIDIA and GDDR-5 memory vs. GDDR-3.
pic 1
HP Elitebook 8740w
|
VG355AV # ACB
|
VG333AV # ACB
|
|
|
OS
|
Windows 7 Professional
|
|
|
Processor
|
Intel Core i7-740QM, 1,73 GHz
|
|
|
Cache L2, KB
|
256 on the core
|
|
|
Cache L3, MB
|
6
|
|
|
Chipset
|
North Bridge: Intel Lynnfield IMC
South Bridge: Intel Ibex Peak-M QM57 |
|
|
Video
|
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M, 1 GB of GDDR-3 |
ATI FirePro M7820, 1 GB of GDDR-5
|
|
Sound
|
IDT 92HD75B3X5
|
|
|
Matrix type
|
17.3 inches
1920x1200 pixels LG LP171WU7-TLB1 |
17.3 inches
1920x1200 pixels Samsung 170CT12-001 |
|
RAM
|
2 +2 +2 +2 GB DDR-3 Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-H9
|
|
|
Hard drive
|
500 GB Seagate ST9500420AS Form Factor: 2.5 ", Buffer: 16 MB Rotational Speed: 7200 rpm, Interface SATA 3 Gb/s
|
500 GB WDC WD5000BEKT-60KA9T0 Form Factor: 2.5 ", Buffer: 16 MB Rotational Speed: 7200 rpm, Interface SATA 3 Gb/s
|
|
Optical drive
|
HP BDDVDW CT21IL
|
|
|
Interfaces
|
2 x USB 2.0
2 x USB 3.0 1 x eSATA 1 x Display Port 1 x D-Sub (VGA) 1 x IEEE-1394 1 x ExpressCard (54 mm) 1 x SC 1 x jack insert a memory card 1 x RJ-45 1 x RJ-11 1 x headphone jack 1 x microphone jack 1 x connection port dock. |
|
|
Wireless interfaces
|
Intel Advanced-N 6200 (802.11 a / b / g / n)
|
|
|
Network adapter
|
Intel 82577LM Gigabit Ethernet
|
|
|
More
|
Web Camera 2 megapixel
|
|
|
Battery
|
Lithium-Ion Battery 68 Wh
|
|
|
Dimensions
|
397,5 x 285,5 x 36,5
|
|
|
Weight, kg
|
3,57
|
|
pic2. HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV # ACB. CPU Info.
pic3. HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV # ACB. Video Info.
pic4. HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV # ACB. Cache and Memory tests.
pic5. HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV # ACB. CPU Info.
pic6. HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV # ACB. Video Info.
pic7. HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV # ACB. Cache and Memory tests.
Supplied
Externally notebooks - the twins, and inside a lot of similarities, but the delivery differ significantly. Both versions are equipped with a charger, a huge set of various brochures, but the number of optical discs in the box is different. Y modification based on the NVIDIA graphics card in a box was discovered only a single disc - WinDVD8. In the modification based on the ATI video number of disks is much greater - as many as six, which occurs first among all notebooks we've tested. So, apart from a disk with software WinDVD8 well as two discs with 32-bit and 64-bit versions of additional software and driver recovery disk Windows 7, a disk with OS Windows XP SP3, as well as a CD with drivers and additional software for Windows XP.
Design and ease of use
pic8. General view.
Even subconsciously from the laptop for 2,5-2,8 thousands of "green" to expect only the best quality and assembly, and then Elitebook expectations. Appearance of this line of laptops is not much different from the more affordable series ProBook, but some important differences still exists. First, the metal panels painted by the titan, but not dark brown varnish, and secondly, the test laptop is not a single glossy panel, and finally, thirdly, the keyboard is not an island type, and more classical, but with a stepped profile.
pic9. General view.
Prints on the gray panels are less visible than a dark brown metallic, but still they can be seen, therefore, have to periodically wipe the casing. But scratch the metal panels is difficult, and according to the manufacturer, they are resistant to scratches by coating HP DuraFinish. Impeccable build quality and nothing to complain about, even if very much want to find a flaw. Rigidity of the body is very high, so even attaching tangible efforts to bend the big building with a relatively small thickness failed, and the squeeze during these executions which either crack or creak as possible. However, it is not surprising, because the laptop case is made on the basis of a magnesium alloy frame and axles made of hardened steel.
pic10. Front view
The front is a button lock lid, a pair of standard audio, install a memory card slot, a pair of speakers, and four status LED activity explanatory icons which are shown on the edge of the panel work area and on the front face cover.
pic11. Rear view
The whole back side is the battery, and a large ventilation grate.
pic12. Left side.
On the left is another ventilation grille, as well as connector security lock slot, external power supply, ports, external displays, D-Sub (VGA) and DisplayPort, which is especially important for the organization mnogodispleynogo workplace, in addition, there are a USB port and IEEE 1394 port, slot, install expansion cards, ExpressCard 54 mm slot smart card reader.
pic12. Right side.
The right side is also pretty loaded: Communication RJ-11 and RJ-45, BD-drive and an eSATA port and three port USB, two of which are version 3.0, but unlike desktop motherboards, they are not highlighted, and only marked a tiny icon.
pic13. Bottom view
Except the bottom vents are a couple of sections that are available to the user (a hard drive, and memory modules and expansion cards), as well as connectors to connect an additional battery and docking station. Corps rests directly on nine rubber feet that are perfectly cling to any tabletop.
pic14. Keyboard.
Connecting loops classic designs, so lid opens to 180 degrees. As mentioned above, the keyboard is not an island type, as in laptops series Probook, and classical, but with a trapezoidal profile keys. The main keypad supplemented by digital unit, but there is no compression on the width of the lettered keys, and hit a key pointer block, which reduced in size to 15h12, 5 mm versus 18x18 mm at the lettered keys. Reason keyboard well secured and does not bend under strong pressure on any key. The keys slightly larger than average, but the response time of good feeling the stiffness of the medium, and the level of noise generated when you are low, so little noticed even in a quiet environment. In general, the keyboard is very convenient and a little inconvenience is perhaps that the classic manipulator PointStick, which at first often got under your finger when typing, which led to the displacement of the cursor. Although in itself this manipulator is very convenient. Immediately below the space bar could fit three keys of the manipulator. Progress in rubber keys is quite large and quiet, and time is also very good response there.
pic15. Touchpad
Just below the touch pad is sized 76h43 mm. Panel slightly recessed into the body, so it's easy to find by touch. As in the case PointStick, in this robot also uses three rubber-coated keys with a similar course as the length and softness. In the near right corner of the workspace is set sensor reading fingerprints. At the edge of the lid is a pair of locks that open with the lid closed small circular sliding panels.
pic16. Sensor reading fingerprints.
pic17. Touch keys icon
Above the keyboard is a power button, and eight soft keys, icons. Unlike earlier models of the series Elitebook, touch strip volume control is replaced with two touch keys, which is not less convenient, but still somehow unusual.
pic18. Webcam
At the upper edge of the display a web camera, a pair of widely spaced microphones and response of the locks.
2. Display
Laptops fitted matte widescreen with a resolution of 1920x1200 pixels. Theoretically, the matrix in both modifications of laptops have to be exactly the same, but at first sight between them is noticeable a difference. In a more detailed study it was found that modifications to the ATI video card installed matrix Samsung 170CT12, and to modify the video card NVIDIA - LG LP171WU7. Characteristics of both matrices are quite similar, and both producers announced the resolution 1920x1200 pixels (16:10 aspect ratio), the maximum brightness - 200 cd / m², Contrast - 400:1, response time - 16 ms. For the matrix LG has also managed to find the claimed viewing angle - 130/110 degrees (H / V), whereas for the matrix manufacturer Samsung does not have these data, although it is worth noting that the visual angles of view of both matrices are virtually identical.
At maximum brightness the luminosity of the white area of the laptop adapter NVIDIA was - 208.1 cd/m2, even more applications, but the model with the ATI adapter showed worse results declared - 182.3 cd/m2. Luminosity of the black field was 0.40 cd/m2 and 0.35 cd/m2, respectively, and this is one of the best results among all notebooks we've tested.
The uniformity of illumination was measured after calibration of the display for two levels of brightness - maximum, and half (100% and 50%). In the graphs below indicate the brightness contrast of the central regions. The difference with the center given in percentages.
pic1. Uniform illumination
To assess the gamut used Spyder3 colorimeter comes with Spyder3Studio . Graph gamut built for the color coordinate system in the Lab coordinates ab to HSH L = 25, 50 and 75. On images of the green curve - HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV # ACB, Yellow - HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV # ACB, and white - the standard color space sRGB.
pic2. Schedule of gamut in the Lab for L = 25
рис3.
Schedule of gamut in the Lab for L = 50
рис4.
Schedule of gamut in the Lab for L = 75
The illustrations listed below are displayed gamma curve (black graphics), obtained before and after calibration, the display, the target range of 2.2 (light blue line) and correction for each color (red, blue, green).
| HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV # ACB | HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV # ACB |
| рис5. Prior to calibration | рис6. Prior to calibration |
| рис7. Gamma curves. After the calibration curves with correction | рис8. Gamma curves. After the calibration curves with correction |
Also, after calibration, the display was measured as a function of color temperature on the brightness level at the target value of 6500K.
Sound system
Both versions are installed exactly the same speakers and audio codecs, so they sound exactly the same. Sound quite detailed and clear, swept RF band, which for a laptop is pretty good, but with the bass full blockage - they are not at all, even worse than some of the frankly cost models. But overall the sound is still very good.
The laptop is used chipset solution IDT 92HD75B3X5 - a four-channel audio codec supports 24-bit audio and sample rates up to 192 kHz. Manufacturer stated SNR of 95 dB and 93 dB dynamic range. A more detailed characteristics of the sound chipset is available on the manufacturer's website . Testing the sound section was performed in a batch RightMark Audio Analyzer (hereinafter RMAA) with audio interface Creative E-MU 0202 USB. All the special effects turned off, equalizer settings by default. Before testing the driver codec has been updated to the most recent version at the time of writing material.
Mode of operation: 16-bit, 44 kHz.
Overall results
| HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV#ACB | HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV#ACB | |||
| Frequency response (40 Hz - 15 kHz), dB | +0.12, -0.16 | Very Good | +0.12, -0.15 | Very Good |
| Noise level, dB (A) | -93.3 | Very Good | -93.2 | Very Good |
| Dynamic range, dB (A) | 92.7 | Very Good | 92.5 | Very Good |
| Harmonic distortion,% | 0.0042 | Very Good | 0.0051 | Very Good |
| THD + Noise, dB (A) | -82.3 | Good | -81.0 | Good |
| IMD + Noise,% | 0.0094 | Very Good | 0.0084 | Very Good |
| Crosstalk, dB | -90.4 | Perfect | -89.0 | Perfect |
| IMD at 10 kHz,% | 0.0086 | Very Good | 0.0090 | Very Good |
| Overall Rating | Very Good | Very Good | ||
Communication
Both laptops are equipped with identical modules, Wi-Fi (802.11 a / b / g / n) and Bluetooth, but only v2.1, while no longer even in some low HP laptops available Bluetooth 3.0. Also, both versions are equipped with exactly the same Gigabit Ethernet-controllers and modems based on Agere Si3054.
Noise and thermal mode
Both laptops seem to be pretty quiet, but it is more likely due to the peculiarities of the algorithm of the active component cooling system, which provides a rare change fan speeds, but between algorithms, and noise testing modifications, there are still differences. Modification with NVIDIA card was more noisy, and even at idle and low-load noise level reaches 34.1 dB, with short-term high loads (up to 20 seconds), fan speeds and does not change, but when sustained load level of noise generated by first increases to 37.6 dB, while the maximum load on the CPU and graphics core up to 40.7 dB, which is already noticeable, even in a noisy office environment. Rotational speed changes gradually as the increase, and in the fall, to the same change in velocity occurs rarely, so much does not cause discomfort. Modification based on the ATI video was not only quieter, but the algorithm was even more successful. At moderate and even quite long (up to a minute), high load noise level is minimal - up to 33.6 dB. Go to the next stage occurs much later than the laptop-based video NVIDIA, in addition, the noise level at an average speed cooler below - up to 35.6 dB. During prolonged high load noise level reaches 38.8 dB, for such a powerful mobile PC is an acceptable figure. As in the case of modification based on the NVIDIA video cooler's rotational speed changes quite smoothly. Below is a summary diagram of the noise level at idle and at maximum load for the HP Pavilion dv7-3090er and HP Pavilion dv7-4030er, Dell Studio 1749 (210-31417), Fujitsu Lifebook NH570 and oboeh tested modifications.
Noise measurement was carried out at 20 cm from the center of the front panel.
Measurements of the level of heating the body were carried out at an ambient temperature of 21 degrees Celsius in the bottom nine points and nine points in the workspace after a 30-minute runtime package 3DMark 2006. Workspace HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV # ACB, depending on the measuring point heated to 27.1 - 37.8 degrees and the bottom - up to 29,3-39,1 degrees. HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV # ACB warms a bit less: a working range up to 25,1-30,7 degrees and the bottom - up to 28,7-37,1 degrees. In general, the heating for the two modifications are well above average, but given the power components, or noise, or heat should be high.
Performance
To be able to compare the performance as the opponents of our base results, we have taken the following laptops:
HP Pavilion dv7-3090er (Intel Core i7-720QM, NVIDIA GeForce GT240M 1024 MB, 4 GB RAM);
Dell Studio 1749 (210-31417) (Intel Core i5-430M, ATI Radeon HD 5650 1024 MB, 4 GB RAM);
Fujitsu Lifebook NH570 (Intel Core i5-430M, 2,26 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce GT330M 1 GB, 4 GB);
HP Pavilion dv7-4030er (Intel Core i5-520M, 2,4 GHz, ATI Radeon HD 5650 1024 MB, 4 GB RAM).
HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV # ACB (Intel Core i7-740QM, NVIDIA Quadro FX2800M 1024 MB, 8 GB RAM);
HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV # ACB (Intel Core i7-740QM, ATI FirePro M7820 1024 MB, 8 GB RAM).
| Fujitsu Lifebook NH570 | Dell Studio 1749 (210-31417) | HP Pavilion dv7-3090er | HP Pavilion dv7-4030er | HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV#ACB | HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV#ACB | |
| PCMark05 | - | - | 6772 | 7606 | - | - |
| CPU | 6725 | 6630 | 7054 | 7157 | 7593 | 7150 |
| Memory | 5735 | 5711 | 8091 | 5907 | 8414 | 8377 |
| Graphics | 5922 | 7291 | 5900 | 7659 | 12146 | 10705 |
| HDD | 5442 | 6347 | 5582 | 6783 | 6570 | 7171 |
| System Test | ||||||
| HDD XP Startup, MB/s | 8,9 | 9,2 | 8,9 | 10,3 | 10,2 | 11,6 |
| Physics and 3D, FPS | 223,3 | 216,2 | 239,9 | 222,6 | 248,7 | 255,6 |
| 2D Transparebt Windows, windows/s | 289,5 | 1341,6 | 881,9 | 1329,7 | 1724,2 | 1087 |
| 3D Pixel Shader, FPS | 320,3 | 422,8 | 282,7 | 425,2 | 912,6 | 690,1 |
| Web Page Rendering, pages/s | 3,3 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 3,3 |
| File Decryption, MB/s | 66,1 | 66,4 | 72,4 | 72,1 | 74,3 | 72,7 |
| Graphics Memory - 64 lines, FPS | 1163,1 | 1322,1 | 1053,5 | 1313,5 | 1776,8 | 1932,8 |
| HDD – General Usage, MB/s | 5,4 | 6,3 | 6,4 | 6,9 | 7,1 | 7,7 |
| Audio Compression, KB/s | - | - | 2959,6 | 2489,9 | - | - |
| Video Encoding, KB/s | - | - | 470,9 | 887,8 | - | - |
| Text edit, pages/s | 154,4 | 111,5 | 135,9 | 144,5 | 140,3 | 136,3 |
| Image Decompression, Mpixel/s | 33,3 | 30,3 | 27,7 | 32,4 | 29,1 | 28,9 |
| File Compression, MB/s | 8,7 | 8,3 | 7,1 | 8 | 7,6 | 7,1 |
| File Encryption, MB/s | 46 | 47,2 | 39 | 41,7 | 47,2 | 42,5 |
| HDD – Virus Scan. MB/s | 86,5 | 90,7 | 94 | 103,3 | 103,8 | 74,9 |
| Memory Latency – Random 16 MB, MAccesses/s | 12,2 | 11,5 | 18,3 | 11,6 | 19,8 | 19,8 |
| CPU Test | ||||||
| File Compression, MB/s | 10,2 | 10,4 | 11,3 | 11,9 | 12 | 11,7 |
| File Decompression, MB/s | 154,4 | 153,9 | 169,4 | 169,4 | 178,7 | 173,7 |
| File Encryption, MB/s | 66,6 | 66,4 | 72,4 | 73 | 76,3 | 74,5 |
| File Decryption, MB/s | 66,1 | 66,2 | 72,4 | 72,7 | 76,4 | 72,7 |
| Image Decompression, Mpixel/s | 34,5 | 34,6 | 33,8 | 36,7 | 38,3 | 38,5 |
| Audio Compression, KB/s | 3530,8 | 3552,5 | 3854,2 | 3857,3 | 4059 | 3971,4 |
| Multithreaded Test 1 | ||||||
| File Compression, MB/s | 10,3 | 10,3 | 9,8 | 10,7 | 10,3 | 9,7 |
| File Encryption, MB/s | 65,2 | 65,8 | 60,8 | 63,4 | 66 | 62,5 |
| Multithreaded Test 2 | ||||||
| File Encryption, MB/s | 104 | 90,2 | 105,4 | 101,6 | 115,3 | 97,1 |
| File Decryption, MB/s | 39,7 | 40 | 44,1 | 43,9 | 48,7 | 44,6 |
| Audio Decompression, KB/s | 1768 | 1871,1 | 1929,4 | 2009,8 | 2115,5 | 1937,6 |
| Image Decompression, MPixel/s | 22,5 | 19,7 | 23,4 | 21,1 | 25,3 | 22,6 |
| 3DMark 2006 | Fujitsu Lifebook NH570 | Dell Studio 1749 (210-31417) | HP Pavilion dv7-3090er | HP Pavilion dv7-4030er | HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV#ACB | HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV#ACB |
| 3DMark Score, 3DMarks | 7095 | 7396 | 6614 | 7537 | 12834 | 11539 |
| GT1 - Return To Proxycon, FPS | 25,65 | 20,678 | 23,084 | 20,873 | 43,756 | 42,042 |
| GT2 - Firefly Forest, FPS | 23,091 | 24,476 | 20,906 | 24,571 | 43,416 | 43,248 |
| CPU Score, CPUMarks | 2637 | 2595 | 2875 | 2801 | 3227 | 3090 |
| CPU Test 1, FPS | 0,852 | 0,833 | 0,957 | 0,905 | 1,062 | 1,057 |
| CPU Test 2, FPS | 1,305 | 1,293 | 1,382 | 1,388 | 1,57 | 1,445 |
| Fill Rate (Single-Texturing), MTexels/s | 2612,155 | 2790,691 | 2615,163 | 2810,228 | 6827,059 | 4808,81 |
| Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing), MTexels/s | 8899,061 | 10491,523 | 7762,522 | 10561,22 | 25056,389 | 23245,084 |
| Pixel Shader, FPS | 265,394 | 342,897 | 235,6 | 345,831 | 604,979 | 453,855 |
| Vertex Shader – Simple, MVertices/s | 232,361 | 251,472 | 203,74 | 253,898 | 320,567 | 242,78 |
| Vertex Shader – Complex, MVertices/s | 101,388 | 100,082 | 97,02 | 101,095 | 185,737 | 154,507 |
| PCMark Vantage | Fujitsu Lifebook NH570 | Dell Studio 1749 (210-31417) | HP Pavilion dv7-3090er | HP Pavilion dv7-4030er | HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV#ACB | HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV#ACB |
| PCMarkSuite | 6216 | 5918 | 5321 | 5684 | 6958 | 7292 |
| Memories Suite | 3782 | 4007 | 3547 | 4108 | 5121 | 5178 |
| TV and Movies Suite | 3633 | - | 4067 | 3892 | 4531 | 4440 |
| Gaming Suite | 5321 | 5571 | 4818 | 4939 | 7017 | 7256 |
| Music Suite | 5628 | 5959 | 5039 | 6507 | 6634 | 7040 |
| Communications Suite | 4848 | 4667 | 3578 | 4345 | 4686 | 4854 |
| Productivity Suite | 5286 | 5314 | 4409 | 4942 | 5909 | 6298 |
| HDD Test Suite | 3263 | 3622 | 3943 | 4113 | 4320 | 5012 |
| HP Elitebook 8740w VG333AV#ACB | HP Elitebook 8740w VG355AV#ACB | |||||||
| Entry | Perfomance | High | Extreme | Entry | Perfomance | High | Extreme | |
| 3DMark Score | 21247 | 8214 | 5342 | 3651 | 17749 | 5806 | 3648 | 2306 |
| CPU Score | 10873 | 10777 | 10917 | 10840 | 10836 | 10872 | 10816 | 10809 |
| Graphics Score | 31155 | 7610 | 4900 | 3528 | 22542 | 5026 | 3266 | 2214 |
Conclusion
Perhaps we should start with the cost of the tested laptops. Modification based on the video card NVIDIA (VG355AV # ACB) found at retail for 2760 "evergreen", and modification based on the adapter ATI (VG333AV # ACB) and even less - $ 2572. In general, for providing the "beef" like and not huge amounts, but still affordable, they are not for everyone.
It was found during testing, differ from these modifications not only graphics cards, but also the matrix and hard drives, and differ not only in their model, but also producers. Nevertheless, the results of their testing are similar. Slightly different maximum brightness - immediately in front of a modification VG355AV # ACB, but the second modification can boast a wider color gamut and a little more uniform illumination. Although we should not forget that in a laptop can be installed any matrix with WUXGA resolution. In modifying the adapter ATI richer supplied less heated enclosure, lower the level of generated noise, more comfortable working algorithm of the active component cooling system, longer battery life in the reader mode, and the price at $ 200 less, but there is a loss in the test duration of battery life in the "classic" benchmark Battery Eater Pro and there is no technology support CUDA, which is already supported by many CAD applications.



























